Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2024, 6:54 pm
A model car manufacturer continued selling Bulli models in packaging stating that they were "officially licenced" after its licence agreement was terminated, but raised questions of "genuine use" of the mark during the infringement proceedings. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:54 pm
Franchisee Ass’n-USA v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:30 am
There was nothing to show that the film has been shown on television or distributed on DVD in the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 10:25 am
Thermolife Int’l, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:28 am
Since the history-making case of Martin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The same Ms Swift has been working hard to secure trade mark protection in the United States for elements of her song lyrics, such as the vivid imagery of "this sick beat" and the rather more prosaic "we never go out of style". [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Honeywell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:49 am
Even assuming that B & B Hardware stands for the proposition that, when considering the issue of priority, courts must determine whether the actual use of a mark is the same as the use stated in a trademark application, Ashe has alleged no actual use of the mark other than those uses described in his trademark application. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:05 am
Perry, Conscience v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:53 pm
Read the whole case, Leith v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:25 pm
Launch in external player Missed the live blog and video of the oral arguments in Goldstein v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:18 am
In Blades v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
Judge Abrams wrote that this “argument is unpersuasive because it conflicts with the Second Circuit’s holding in Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:09 am
& B.P. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm
Yesterday marked the 37th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Wal-Mart, 131 S.Ct. at 2556 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
The state of the proceedings did not therefore permit final judgment to be given, so that Mega Brands’ application to dismiss the opposition in respect of the application to register its figurative mark had to be dismissed.Says the IPKat, this is another classic example of two trivial questions -- "will Spanish people who buy toys be confused between MAGNET 4 and the MAGNEXT word and figurative marks? [read post]
