Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 2921 - 2940 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am by Mark Graber
The following post is by Mark Graber, co-editor with Mark Tushnet and Sanford Levinson of the recently published Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am by Josh H. Escovedo
The TTAB disagreed, stating that “Consumers, like competitors, may have a real interest in keeping merely descriptive or generic words in the public domain. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 12:43 pm by Jonathan DeFosse
December 1, 2020 will mark the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
 The verbal description of the mark states: "The mark consists of a three dimensional ivory-coloured tile on the top surface of which is shown a letter of the Roman alphabet and a number in the range of 1 to 10". [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
Secondly, either the users or the operators of the website must be infringing the claimant’s trade marks. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
  The reports have been known about for some time, and are mentioned prominently in the complaint in McIntosh v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Debbie Kaminer, Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in EEOC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:54 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
A model car manufacturer continued selling Bulli models in packaging stating that they were "officially licenced" after its licence agreement was terminated, but raised questions of "genuine use" of the mark during the infringement proceedings. [read post]