Search for: "State v. State" Results 2921 - 2940 of 258,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2021, 9:44 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Defense’s failure to present certain evidence A jury, in the Circuit Court for Caroline County, convicted Michael Neff, appellant, of theft. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:14 pm by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress — Search incident to arrest This case is before us on the State’s appeal of the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County’s order granting a motion to suppress evidence filed by Troy Somerville, appellee. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:43 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Smith contends that the State breached the parties’ plea [...] [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Hoffman argues she did not knowingly and voluntarily waive her right to counsel, the circuit court made evidentiary errors, and the State made an improper closing argument. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:40 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
He argues that the circuit court’s decision denying his motion for a continuance violated his federal and state constitutional right to counsel of his choice and [...] [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:30 am by Lumen N. Mulligan
  Similarly, scholars have often noted that the scope of government-contractor immunity under Boyle v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:04 am
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Second, to the extent there is some doubt under state law as to an officer's or agency's power to sue, or any other state-law issue that may be dispositive, federal courts should abstain under Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm by Zachary Spilman
On Tuesday, January 24, CAAF will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:17 am by immigrationprof
PENNumbra, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review's online publication, has a discussion between Professors Peter Spiro (Temple) and Kit Johnson (Oklahoma) on "Immigration Preemption after United States v. [read post]