Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 2921 - 2940 of 7,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2019, 11:13 am by Coleman Saunders
Jones, in which the court held that the state government can compel password decryption. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:09 am by WSLL
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: STEPHEN SMITH and AUDREY SMITH, husband and wife v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 9:46 pm by Mark Summerfield
Back in March, I reported on a decision of Justice Stephen Burley denying Pfizer an order for preliminary discovery to confirm its belief that Samsung Bioepis AU (‘SBA’) was infringing a patent covering methods of producing Pfizer’s biological medicine for treatment of autoimmune diseases marketed under the name ENBREL. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 6:48 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Language scientists have made great strides in the past quarter-Century, but legal professionals are only now waking-up to the importance of this language tool.In People v Harris, Justices Zahra and Stephen Markman both used corpus linguistics in opposing opinions to address a legal question involving whether a police officer's false statement is nevertheless protected within the scope of a Michigan law that procribes a police officer’s involuntary statement from… [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:40 am
On March 4, 2014, Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the Supreme Court's opinion in Law v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am by Edmund LaCour
But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor) filed a concurrence stating that the issue should be reviewed when presented outside the AEDPA context. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am by Gillian Metzger
  This is true of both Oil States Energy Services. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
Three dissenting Justices (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and David Souter) argued that the law burdened many voters, and it was not justified by any state interest, given that the state failed to prove the law was necessary to prevent voter fraud or promote public confidence in the election process. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:32 pm
 That provided an opening for Justice Stephen G. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:38 pm by Ilya Somin
Here is an excerpt: Wednesday's Supreme Court decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:14 am by Amy Howe
In a footnote in their opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm by Suzanne Ito
United States This week the Supreme Court heard arguments in one of the big cases of the term, Arizona v. [read post]