Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 44,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2014, 12:50 pm
Milne died on August 4, 2013, while still obligated to pay child support to Ms. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Even setting aside Bush v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
Though not expressly stated in the Order, it seems likely that Judge Rakoff was deferring the issuance of a fully-reasoned order until the Supreme Court’s issuance of its Dukes v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:16 pm
In Joiner v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 11:36 am
” For standing purposes, it doesn’t matter that he still advertises through AdWords. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
On the first question – whether Section 5 was still necessary – some of the Court’s more liberal Justices were emphatic that even if voter registration and voter turn-out rates have improved in the states covered by Section 5, there is still discrimination at the polls in those states. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
(Posted one day late) Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
Dating to 1976’s Buckley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:31 am
The Court found the state failed to prove that the remaining provisions would still effectively carry out the legislature’s intent without the unconstitutional parts. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:31 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
But the Supreme Court may still avoid ruling on the merits.] [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 2:08 pm
That was our experience as appellate military defense counsel in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:34 pm
U.S. 438 (1972) and Griswold v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 8:10 am
Case citation: McGhee v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court decided Grady v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
Babenko v Ukraine Appn No 68726/10 of 4/1/12 is an ECHR Chamber decision which looks at the relationship between an applicant’s right to social housing from the state and Art 1 of the ECHR First Protocol.The Applicant was a WWII veteran who registered in 2004 for social housing with the local housing executive. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
Babenko v Ukraine Appn No 68726/10 of 4/1/12 is an ECHR Chamber decision which looks at the relationship between an applicant’s right to social housing from the state and Art 1 of the ECHR First Protocol.The Applicant was a WWII veteran who registered in 2004 for social housing with the local housing executive. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:31 pm
In the case of Davila v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:04 pm
The SG's invitation brief in No. 06-273, Cox v. [read post]
