Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 14,816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
In Haidak v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:20 am
Therefore, it is an abuse of discretion to rely on scoring models to determine a sentence.Rhodes v State, 896 NE2d 1193 (Ind App 2008). [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the government’s… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Cooke & Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Considers Class Action Waiver in Arbitration Agreement Signed by Ernst & Young Workers
7 Dec 2015, 9:29 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:31 pm
Colon et. al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:04 pm
(See James v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
The basic rationale is that without a physical presence, there's not a strong enough connection between the seller and the state. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:48 pm
In State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 7:06 am
CeramTec GmbH v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
For the convenience of readers, I reiterate from previous postings that Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 3:46 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:47 pm
I agree with this unnamed individual that state law will move more quickly than federal law and California will go first before, say, Idaho, Utah and Arizona. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:12 am
The fact that "'explanatory speech is necessary is strong evidence that the conduct at issue … is not so inherently expressive that it warrants protection' as symbolic speech" [indirectly quoting Rumsfeld v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
" In front of an audience that was inured to political defeat - the 20th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
How strong is that presumption? [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 5:05 pm
" [quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:18 am
” In a recent case out of Kentucky (In RE: The Estate of Audrey Deinlein v. [read post]
