Search for: "Styles v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 5,642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
It is styled, Nationwide Property & Casualty v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:49 am
In the case styled SWEPI, LP v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:53 am
This is discussed in a 1997, Austin Court of Appeals opinion styled, State Farm v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 9:17 am
The Court of Chancery recently addressed this issue in the case ironically styled as McWane, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 7:40 am
The style of the case is, Allen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:36 pm
It is Seasons Style Number AC 15-0065. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 1:34 pm
In Muzichuck v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
The style of the opinion is, Chicago Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:56 am
Now, I’m not suggesting a brand manager or trademark counsel go all out crazy here — Freddy-Krueger-style, but I’ve also seen far worse cases pursued too. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
Plywood Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:46 am
” In Macy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 1:08 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
Jordan's natural jump or dunking style. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015)The general offices of the Central Party and State Council recently issued a directive calling for the strengthening of civic education in Chinese universities along the ideological lines specified through the Chinese Communist Party. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
It is a Houston Court of Appeals [14th Dist.] case styled, Allstate v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
