Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan" Results 2921 - 2940 of 4,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Just over two sides of the judgment were devoted to the discussion of the Grokster case (MGM v Grokster, 2005) - a case that was heavily relied upon by Viacom in their summary judgement - and its ‘progeny’ - Arista Records v Usenet (2009), Columbia Pictures v Fung (2009), and Arista Records v Lime Group LLC (2010). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:51 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell client memorandum, and relates to an appeal in the case of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Finally, in 2004, an Illinois court explicitly held that a physician was not qualified to testify as to the standard of care for the nursing profession under the laws of the state of Illinois (Sullivan v Edward Hospital, 806 NE2d 645 [Ill 2004]). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:36 am by Eric Lipman
Danny Sullivan (no, not the race car driver Danny Sullivan featured in my last post) of Search Engine Land claims to have had the original scoop on the Rosenberg v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Erin Miller
Sullivan), the right to vote (Baker v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Finally, a May 26, 2010 memo from the Pillsbury Winthrop law firm discusses the Second Circuit’s May 18, 2010 decision in Slayton v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
Sullivan & Cromwell for UIL, Chadbourne & Parke for Iberdrola. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:29 am by Matt C. Bailey
On April 27, 2010, Northern District Court Judge, Claudia Wilken, certified a proposed class action in Sullivan v. [read post]