Search for: "Topping v. People" Results 2921 - 2940 of 5,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2009, 3:18 am
At the top of the food chain is McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:42 pm
By Mike Dorf In yesterday's SCOTUS opinion in NASA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, there seems to be little concrete reason to think that they would substantially deter employers from properly discharging or disciplining incompetent employees, especially on top of the existing burdens that employment law already creates. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:45 am
   The RVO spec, like its name suggests, allows harsher punishment of people who’ve previously committed violent crimes:   on top of the maximum sentence, the judge can impose an additional one to ten years if he makes certain findings. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
’s top military officer, its chief of Defence Staff put it in terms that the resulting tensions “risk inflaming an arc of instability” in the region. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Donald, 14-618, a state-on-top habeas case, stems from a multi-defendant murder case in which the respondent alleges his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by being absent for ten minutes while the trial court received evidence about co-defendants. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Researchers have revealed the specific harms and disproportionate negative impacts surveillance and algorithmic tools can have on disabled people in education, the legal system, health care and the workplace. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  His earlier book, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (2007) demonstrated the continued possession by many Americans of a sense of their sovereign authority. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
Part of the problem, no doubt is that confusing decision of the Supreme Court in Philip Morris v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
"(Makes you want to take a second look at his vote in Bush v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:48 pm
” Yet in 1998, Southwick agreed in Richmond v. [read post]