Search for: "U.S. District Court for Northern District of California" Results 2921 - 2940 of 3,656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 6:13 pm by Brad Pauley
District Court for the Northern District of California, asserting that Prop 8 violates the federal constitution. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:16 am by Brian Wolfman
District Court for the Northern District of California explains here. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:23 am by SOIssues
Northern District Magistrate Judge James Larson agreed and granted a permanent injunction removing the man's information from the site. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
Robbins.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Amicus brief of the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:32 pm by Steve Bainbridge
District Court for the Northern District of California applied federal law to reject the argument that directors can amend bylaws to require (without seeking shareholder approval), all derivative suits to be filed in a particular jurisidiction, such as the state of formation. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Keller, a college football player, had filed a complaint in the Northern District of California against a number of defendants including Electronic Arts (“EA”) on a several theories, including a violation of his rights of publicity under California statutory and common law. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am by Albert Wan
Some district courts, including the Southern District of California, the Eastern District of Michigan, and the Eastern District of New York, have held that Padilla’s application of Strickland did not create a “new” rule, thus barring application of § 2255(f)(3). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:41 pm by Mike
Curry (9th Cir. 2010) the case is remanded to BPH to make a finding - the District Court cannot compel the warden to release the prisoner on parole. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am by Sheppard Mullin
On Monday, February 8, 2011, the Ninth Circuit reversed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, which had held that Levi Strauss failed to establish by a preponderance of evidence that Abercrombie & Fitch's Ruehl pocket stitching design is likely to cause dilution by blurring of Levi Strauss' famous Arcuate pocket stitching design because it had not established that "[Abercrombie] is making commercial… [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:31 pm by Michael McCann
District Court for the Northern District of California in Pecover. [read post]
Fred’s decision to suffer the public condemnation of arrest and imprisonment to do what was right, his decision to allow the ACLU of Northern California to represent him in the test case before the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:31 pm by Ben Rubin
On February 2, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a settlement agreement (pdf) between the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Kaimipono D. Wenger
Attorney, District of Arizona (2007-09); Chief Counsel, U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:03 pm by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 08-15780, appealed from United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:11 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
District Court for the Northern District of California did not abuse its discretion in finding that the large and diverse class – encompassing approximately 1.5 million female employees, both salaried and hourly with a range of positions, who are or were employed at one or more of company’s 3,400 stores across the country – was united by a complex of company-wide discriminatory practices against women where plaintiffs presented expert… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:41 pm by Keith Rizzardi
Relatedly, Home Builders Ass’n of Northern California v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) that Plaintiff-Appellant Gaeta’s state law causes of action were preempted by the FDC Act to the extent that they allowed for liability based on a lack of adequate warning on Perrigo’s Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) ibuprofen drug product. [read post]