Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 51,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2009, 5:03 am
In the case Christman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am
We hold that the relevant wage order and statutes do not permit application of the de minimis rule on the facts given to us by the Ninth Circuit, where the employer required the employee to work “off the clock” several minutes per shift. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
Given that therefore, a EP (UK) patent was not possible for the relevant indications, Roche argued that an Arrow declaration could serve no useful or legal purpose. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:51 am
A brief account of the facts was given in Joshua Rozenberg’s post published earlier. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
That’s why I was disappointed to see the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling in Beard v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:51 am
AOL, Elansari v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
We thus consider with fresh eyes the question posed to us by the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 10:00 am
Decision Retroactive In January of 2016 the Court held that its 2012 decision in the case Miller v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm
A person can act as an agent on an ad hoc basis (or as a ‘servant without remuneration’) if he is given a task to perform and is doing the principal’s work for him: Hewitt v Bonvin at 192 per Mackinnon LJ. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm
The judgment in Sinkova v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am
See Winston v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:11 pm
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
A reader writes to tell me that the unfortunate decision in Whirlpool, Inc. v Camacho was marred by the fact that the winning law firm had given $67,500 to three members of the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 9:58 am
Sample v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
Final warning given. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:41 pm
" Gonna have to use that one myself the next time I'm caught with meth near my anus. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
(Justice Murray's opinion doesn't use Jessica's last name, but it should -- as I've said previously in connection with a different very long murder opinion by Justice Murray. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm
On 27 February 2023 judgment was handed down in the case of FGX v Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
Given the frequent use of pre-litigation jury trial waivers in contracts, it may be news to some that such waivers are considered unenforceable under California law since the California supreme court’s decision in Grafton Partners L.P. v. [read post]
