Search for: "United States v. Jones"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 3,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
United States, the Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell case, reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
" Stephanie Mencimer, Consumer Protection's Citizens United, Mother Jones "In sum, I think Respondents have to be pleased with how the argument went. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
United States, which challenges gender-based residency requirements for transmitting U.S. citizenship. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
In particular, there was no counterpart in PECUSA's Constitution to the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
Audio for Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
Jones v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am
At the Concurring Opinions blog, Gerard Magliocca has a post titled “Interesting Cases You’ve Never Heard of – The Pueblo Indians” in which he discusses the Court’s 1876 opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
Episode 059 – Conversation with Anita Aboagye-Agyeman.mp3 This pod cast features Anita Aboagye-Agyeman, Brooklyn Law School Class of 2011 discussing her recent appearance before the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:27 am
" This could set up a contentious and public policy battle between the United States Department of Commerce and the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
United States, which challenged whether an individual under surveillance has the right to sue when the government has kept documentation of this surveillance. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:09 pm
The issues for Wednesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:07 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
The Judge Advocate General of the Navy has certified this issue to CAAF in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
Here’s a very brief summary: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:24 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Finally, as part of the lasting legacy of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 pm
Jones & Laughlin Steel, United States v. [read post]
