Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 1:42 pm
United States, , 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507 (1967); the statements in this piece are not affected by the property analysis in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Gentry v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
HTC Corporation, et al.- United States District Court – Eastern District of Virginia – March 15th, 2017) involves a claim of trademark infringement. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:51 am
Today in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:41 am
Last week in United States of America v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
This morning the justices will close out the January session with one oral argument, in Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
Oyama v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am
In or about August 2010, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, in coordination with DOJ, issued a subpoena to BP for flow-rate related documents from April 20, 2010 to August 9, 2010. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:44 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:42 pm
From yesterday’s United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am
According to markings on these documents, the e-mails were printed on August 8, 2009, in the United States. 85. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Its products (especially cosmetics and perfumes) are distributed through a closed distribution network, in which authorised distributors are restrained from supplying products to other distributors.L’Oréal complains that eBay is involved in trade mark infringements committed by users of its website. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 1:59 pm
Statutory Cause of Action Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 92060308. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
United States in 2001); and even one’s own front porch (Florida v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
As the Brennan Center has noted, state critical infrastructure laws borrow from the federal concept of critical infrastructure: segments of the economy “so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect” on national security and public safety, thereby deserving enhanced legislative protection. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:09 am
So held the Sixth Circuit in yesterday’s United States v. [read post]
