Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 14,190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
United States, the next year’s United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:12 pm
Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc., No. 19-10545 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:12 pm
Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc., No. 19-10545 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 10:35 am
And once the U.S. is substituted as a defendant, the case can be dismissed altogether, because "the United States has not waived its [sovereign] immunity to libel suits" (see the Federal Tort Claims Act). [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 8:55 am
” Thus, like Yang v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm
Mai was born in a Thai refugee camp to a Vietnamese family and moved to the United States at the age of two. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 1:30 pm
It concluded that Younger abstention ought not apply to litigation brought by the United States, and a personal suit by the President was close enough to create similar considerations. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
” From the Introduction: On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
TPM rules that have no nexus with copyright infringement vaporize the vital qualitative considerations in copyright's free expression exemptions, leaving behind a quantitative residue that is easy for computers to act upon, but which does not correspond closely to the policy objectives of limitations in copyright. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
See, for example, United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
[An overlooked part of United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:00 am
Do we actually have the same magnitude of a problem in the United States as it is in India? [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In the United States, however, the rate has steadily increased over the last twenty years. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
