Search for: "United States v. Stevens"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 4,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 1:07 pm
Check the Abbott v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:19 am
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:10 am
” Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Thomas and Breyer, stated their disagreement in a lengthy dissent. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
" Human Rights Watch says the United States has 2,574 inmates serving life terms for crimes they committed before age 18. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
United States Supreme Court Decision: May 17, 2010 In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme Court ruled that sentencing juveniles to life without the possibility of parole for non-homicide cases is impermissible under the Eighth Amendment’s cruel and unusual punishment clause. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm
Thus, as petitioner contends and respondent does not contest, the United States is the only Nation that imposes life without parole sentences on juvenile nonhomicide offenders. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:10 pm
Quoth Justice Stevens, in Illinois v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:56 am
United States, 217 U. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:25 am
The question before us is not whether international law prohibits the United States from imposing the sentence at issue in this case. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:38 am
And Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am
The rulings are: In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm
Steven Binette. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:05 am
Gore and Citizens United mean that the Court shapes our elections almost as much as the elections shape the Court. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:02 pm
In Padilla v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
The trial and appeals courts did not accept Mon River's argument that it, as a tower, only owed Ingram a tort-based duty of reasonable care under Stevens v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
United States.) [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:29 am
Kagan’s approach builds on prior caselaw, including United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:09 pm
Connecticut, of course, also treats sex offender registration as regulatory rather than a punitive measure (State v. [read post]
