Search for: "Abid v. Abid"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 10:21 am
Under the guise of “reform”, these attempts to curtail abuse by a small minority of claimants and unscrupulous providers will have the concurrently devastating effect of depriving the vast majority of innocent, law abiding claimants from accessing medical care in a timely and efficient manner. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
Odone is referring to Johns & Anor, R (on the application of) v Derby City Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
(citing Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:38 pm
In a recent case, H.S.M. v J.T.M. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:47 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:17 am
Katz v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:32 am
” Concluding that the State’s internally adopted standard of care, if any, for the routine, non-emergency operation of a motor vehicle on the beach, is relevant, Judge Milano said that a "failure to abide by its own rule is some evidence of negligence. [read post]
ANTI-GUNS-ON-CAMPUS BLOWBACK: You know, I raised this issue with a Faculty Senate colleague and was…
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
This right, however, was usurped by laws designed to disarm law abiding students and faculty. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 5:37 pm
Last week, I discussed Kamakahi v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
Meanwhile, the FTC has filed a lawsuit in the District of Nevada, FTC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
" Andrea's quote explained the position of the Venezuelan government in Exxon Mobil v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The sponsors’ duty is, in essence,to ensure that the students pursuing a course of study at their institutions abide by the conditions of their leave to enter the UK. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
F.T. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
The post discusses how the UK courts and the ECtHR have dealt with the Ministerial exception, concluding that religiously based claims now have to abide by respect for human rights generally – and equality law in particular. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
Lord Brown said: "On any possible view the whole scheme was in the highest degree dishonest and any law-abiding citizen would be not merely shocked by it but astonished to suppose that, once discovered, instead of being enforced against, it would be crowned with success, with Mr Beesley entitled to a certificate of lawful use to prove it. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
Lord Brown said: "On any possible view the whole scheme was in the highest degree dishonest and any law-abiding citizen would be not merely shocked by it but astonished to suppose that, once discovered, instead of being enforced against, it would be crowned with success, with Mr Beesley entitled to a certificate of lawful use to prove it. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:01 am
For example, in Thomas v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:54 am
Additionally, to dismiss the appeal would also damage the public’s confidence in planning law: any law-abiding citizen would be astonished to suppose that Mr Beesley’s dishonest scheme, once being discovered, would not be enforced against but rather crowned with success. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
