Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2009, 6:48 am
Jurors in Kings County are usually thought to be very generous but look at the Tushaj v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
The Superior Court denied the motion for attorney fees, and the employee appealed. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:52 pm
There's an interesting new decision from the appellate division of the NJ Superior Court, Hoffman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Braman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:30 am
Superior Court, 80 Cal. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV,… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:17 am
Woods v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
However, plaintiffs’ attorneys have generally been unable to obtain similar verdicts in other states. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
However, plaintiffs’ attorneys have generally been unable to obtain similar verdicts in other states. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At 11 a.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Vermont v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:08 am
Superior Court [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
” If he lives in the USA he may be aware that the original and authoritative and therefore binding (including upon the Supreme Court itself) Supreme Court precedent Worcester v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:16 pm
Here's how the court of appeal in Tritek Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:09 pm
~~~Incidental Intelligence:In a case of "everything old is new again," California Attorney General Edmund G. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (1981) 118 Cal.App.3d 761. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 8:56 pm
The general trend has been that the courts do not mind -- at all -- if employees' names and addresses are disclosed to plaintiffs' attorneys in class action cases. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:17 am
Superior Court, supra (quoting Strassheim v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:28 pm
The Court of Appeals in DeCabrera v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 4:57 pm
On December 19, 2008, in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 9:48 am
Yesterday we discussed the outrageous attorneys fees in the Robertson v. [read post]