Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 2941 - 2960 of 21,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 2:49 pm
From Mc Naughtiness McNaughton v. de Blasio (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
" Here's the abstract:This article adds to the growing body of scholarship addressing the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (SFFA) that effectively ended race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions as we know it. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
The Court however reiterated that a Member State which had granted or sought to be allowed to grant aid under one of the exceptions provided for in the Treaty rules had a duty to cooperate with the Commission in the proceeding in which it took part, pursuant to which it must in particular provided all the information necessary to enable the Commission to verify that the conditions for the derogation sought were fulfilled (Case C‑364/90 Italy v Commission [1993]; Joined Cases… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:50 am by Ashby Jones
Americans, it seems, don’t have a lot of love for the body of federal lawmakers we like to call Congress. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm by Alan Alexandroff
  [1] Isabelle van Damme, “Treaty Interpretation by the Appellate Body”,  Eur. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:30 am by Rob Green
The name of the body of water in dispute has long been a point of contention in the Middle East. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
Jacob LJ dealt with this back in 2008, saying that there might be a sanction under competition law but noting that the application of that body of law to unmeritorious patents was not something that had been explored. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:25 am by Will Baude
  But one interesting point I haven't seen noted has been what appears to be a slight revision in his view of Arizona v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
Further, this would leave open the lawfulness of the exclusion of office-holders who are not engaged by public bodies within the scope of the HRA. [read post]