Search for: "C. M. v. State"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 6,592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Verlag Esterbauer GmbH, C-490/14, 29 October 2015 protection of databases in EU https://t.co/HV4nn0kTiW -> With TPP advancing, India pins hopes on China-backed trade bloc | Reuters https://t.co/nDPI8EI057 -> President Obama Sends Two WIPO Copyright Treaties To US Senate For Ratification https://t.co/yBOTFeMXi3 -> Copyright notice scheme takes back seat to website blocking https://t.co/w2rcox4IYA -> Copyright Protection in Canada for Artists https://t.co/UzdKg9Z5zM -> Linking… [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 6:58 am
Dorobantu, Natasha Dupont, & M. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:52 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In Bongrain SA’s Trade Mark Application [2004] EWCA Civ 1690 at [26]-[28], Jacobs LJ had, interpreting various European case law including Joined Cases C-456/01P and C-457/01 P Henkel v OHIM EU:C:2004:258, rejected the idea that a “fancy” or unusual shape of goods would automatically be taken by the public as a trade mark denoting trade origin. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:39 am
Utah state Rep. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
Pryor II v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Crawford Anthony C. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:18 am
In interpreting a prior version of Act 312, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:18 am
In interpreting a prior version of Act 312, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
”Stephen M. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Start with Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:50 am
And more than that, a significant Connecticut Supreme Court case (Standard Oil of Connecticut v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:03 am
The case of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Hague International Tribunals: International Court of Justice Juliette Mcintyre, The Declaratory Judgment in Recent Jurisprudence of the ICJ: Conflicting Approaches to State Responsibility? [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
Indeed, she would have completely missed the recent unreported decision of Mr Justice Carr in the on-going Stretchline v H&M dispute (see previous posts here) had it not been gratefully brought to her attention by an eagle eyed reader. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm
See McKoy v. [read post]
