Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 9:36 am
The California Supreme Court just made a mixed up jumble of this mixed motive law in Harris v City of Santa Monica (2013) 13 C.D.O.S. 1516. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:16 am
See Khan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm
The case, See’s Candies, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:08 am
California's Fifth Appellate District held recently in King v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 7:19 am
The California Legislature enacted a comprehensive law covering the requirements for lawsuits regarding construction defects. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:00 am
Deaver v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:16 pm
Still, Penal Code section 12022(a)(1) and other California gun states remain the law and have not been explicitly invalidated by McDonald. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:10 am
City of Sunnyvale highlights the confusion in California law as to what is or is not a judgment in which he argues that California's law on judgments needs improvement.In California, statutorily, “[a] judgment is the final determination of the rights of the parties in an action or proceeding. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
The October 2009 issue of California Lawyer has an interesting article on Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 11:37 am
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm
In Saheli v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm
In Saheli v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:13 pm
The change is significant on the issue of commute time under California law: "[W]e vacate the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Rutti’s claim for compensation of his commute under California law and on his postliminary activity of required daily portable data transmissions, and remand the matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Morales The inspiration for the bill that is currently being considered in California is the case of People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:49 am
Our experts are at the forefront of emerging employment law developments and are well-practiced in applying employment laws to California businesses. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
I hate Alvarez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 2:34 pm
In Green v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court ruled that anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers are likely to succeed in their First Amendment challenge to a California law that requires such centers to meet several requirements, such displaying certain notices to patients. [read post]
