Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 2941 - 2960 of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
As with the law in general,1 the First Amendment is a jealous mistress. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:32 am by Robert B. Milligan
Lastly, the bill does not preempt any other provision of law. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
National Security Law, 2e Editors: Craig Forcese & Leah West ISBN: Print (Paperback): 9781552215517 Publisher: Irwin Law Page Count: 800 pages Publication Date: December 1, 2020 Regular Price: $75.00 Excerpt from pages 3–7; 23–29; 57–61 (citations omitted) Chapter 1: Scope This is a book about the law governing the Canadian state’s response to serious crises; that is, events that jeopardize its “national security. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Indeed, as regards the first example, the Article 29 Working Party suggested as far back as 2008 (p. 14) that image processing may be particularly intrusive and require specific attention. [read post]
8 May 2017, 12:43 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Differences over document D23.1 Document D2 was taken as the closest prior art in the the contested decision.The analysis of the difference over document D2 in the contested decision is based on features which are no longer present in claim 1, and therefore does not need to be discussed here.3.2 Document D2 discloses a system for dispensing beverages in which a typical interaction between a customer ("Frank") and the system is set out in Example 6 (page 29). [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:03 pm
UPDATE 29 June: ASIC comments: "The Court has clarified important aspects of insider trading law, for example the operation of ‘Chinese Walls' and the passing of sensitive information. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:44 pm by Simon Gibbs
” Is it sufficient to advise “we have entered into a CFA” or “our client has the benefit of an ATE policy” or does it trigger the full requirements under CPD 19.4? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am by Roel van Woudenberg
"Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 was identical to claim 1 of the main request except for the addition of the wording "wherein parent plants used in the cross are sexually incompatible" at the end of the claim.Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 read: [...]Claim 1 of the five claims of auxiliary… [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Yet, that responsibility does not apply to l [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Rethinking Canadian Legal Responses to Frozen Embryo Disputes Stefanie CarsleyCanadian Journal of Family Law issue #29(1) Copyright © 2015 Reprinted with permission from The Canadian Journal of Family Law Excerpt: Introduction and Part I[Footnotes omitted. [read post]