Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 5,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Press The Influence of Ex Parte Quirin and Courts-Martial on Military Commissions [pdf] Morris D. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:16 pm
Pix Credit HEREA delectable scrap has been provided us by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who gratefully acknowledged the financial support of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for EconomicCooperation and Development (BMZ). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 9:33 am
But Yukins points out that when a contract is terminated for convenience, companies' sunk costs will be covered by the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
Noting that justification is an affirmative defense which a defendant carries the burden of proving at trial, the court joined the Court of Appeals in adopting an analysis from United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:28 pm
” Ex. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 6:15 am
I'll make a separate post out of this part. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
"The seventh fraud count was based on an allegedly false statement in Apple's Section 8 & 15 declaration that: "[T]here is no proceeding involving said rights pending and not finally disposed of either in the United States Patent and Trademark Office or in a court. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:20 pm
You may not even care about the merits of Al-Nashiri's claim (whether, at the time of the Cole bombing in October 2000, the United States was already involved in an "armed conflict" under the laws of war with al Qaeda, which is what the MCA itself requires in order for the commissions to have jurisdiction). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:57 pm
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California apparently got the same impression, which is why he set a TRO hearing (to be conducted via Zoom) for Monday, August 24:"CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING FOR [17] MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Hearing re: [17] MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support… [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:06 am
Klasfeld’s reporting is part of Just Security’s Trump Trials Clearinghouse. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Yozmot 33 Limited (EPLAW) United States US General Comcast owes P2P users $16; yes, they should take it (Ars Technica) Dow Jones files hot news misappropriation suit against Breifing.com (The Trademark Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms ITC’s findings that Global Locate has standing, SiRF directly infringes patents: SiRF v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Challenge to plaintiff’s… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:25 pm
— (h) An action to enforce a claim of a deficiency related to a note secured by a mortgage against a residential property that is a one-family to four-familydwelling unit. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 4:49 am
FOREIGN RELATIONS The United States “supports creating two permanent U.N. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
According to United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:59 pm
Assange had already come under criticism from WikiLeaks insiders for focusing all of the organization’s 2010 leaks on the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
Not OK(4) Ex ante lump sum remuneration that only takes into account copying speed not OK. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
The dissenting judge has also pointed out that “suspension and holding in abeyance” was added to article 6 as an amendment in 2010, more than two years after the state of emergency was imposed in 2007 (though subversion was part of article 6 originally). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
