Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE" Results 2941 - 2960 of 4,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The first trial ended in a mistrial when jurors could not agree on whether he should be convicted of second-degree or first-degree murder.In advance of that trial, the prosecutors developed a strategy to get around the requirements of the United States Supreme Court’s 1986 Batson v Kentucky decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 7:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
” One professor who was a former clerk “gave no examples” in stating that Scalia followed his principles. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
Earlier this fall, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument in Tanner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Nevertheless, the Policy Statement will be published in the Federal Register, and comments may be submitted until July 3, 2023.[5] BACKGROUND The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)[6] makes it unlawful for any covered person or service provider to engage in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice.[7] The Dodd-Frank Act also provides the CFPB with rulemaking authority to define and prevent unfair,… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
LEXIS 27198In the Gilligan case the major issues involved allegations by a former employee of the Town of Moreau (a) that she was dismissed from her position with the Town in retaliation for her testifying before a grand jury and (b) that she had been defamed by Town officials.Among the events that resulted in this litigation was a New York State Police investigation of the activities of the Town Supervisor, Michael Sullivan, and Frank Burt, a contractor hired to haul sand to the… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, I wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by Mindy Harris
Supreme Court’s June 29, 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:28 am by David Lynn
  The outcome of this case may give the SEC some hope that the Court will reverse the three-judge panel’s holding that the Dodd-Frank Act conflict minerals disclosure rules violate the First Amendment in National Association of Manufacturers, et al., v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
In Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus and David McDonald argue that the Court should grant review in Foster v. [read post]