Search for: "Frank v. State"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 4,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2016, 5:31 pm
Superior Court.2013In American Express Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
Earlier this fall, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument in Tanner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Nevertheless, the Policy Statement will be published in the Federal Register, and comments may be submitted until July 3, 2023.[5] BACKGROUND The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)[6] makes it unlawful for any covered person or service provider to engage in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice.[7] The Dodd-Frank Act also provides the CFPB with rulemaking authority to define and prevent unfair,… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
LEXIS 27198In the Gilligan case the major issues involved allegations by a former employee of the Town of Moreau (a) that she was dismissed from her position with the Town in retaliation for her testifying before a grand jury and (b) that she had been defamed by Town officials.Among the events that resulted in this litigation was a New York State Police investigation of the activities of the Town Supervisor, Michael Sullivan, and Frank Burt, a contractor hired to haul sand to the… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
Last year, I wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
Supreme Court’s June 29, 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:45 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; and John V. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
The outcome of this case may give the SEC some hope that the Court will reverse the three-judge panel’s holding that the Dodd-Frank Act conflict minerals disclosure rules violate the First Amendment in National Association of Manufacturers, et al., v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:07 am
Leighton (Illinois) and Frank J. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
In Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus and David McDonald argue that the Court should grant review in Foster v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
” (See Pittsburgh Press Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:58 am
Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm
Pierce v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:47 am
(quoting Frank, 951 F.2d at 322). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
The justices are scheduled to hear oral argument in Liu’s case on March 3, 2020 (Liu v. [read post]
