Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 5,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
By Thomas Kaufman This morning, the California Supreme Court issued the long-awaited decision in Harris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:13 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
In Brady v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
Barko v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:03 am
More on Martinez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Bob Barr urges the justices to hear Blagojevich v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in KSR v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
A notable exception is Justice Harry A. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
The attorneys cite Bianchi v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
In March, in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
In Cumbie v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
Harris) involved a claim that California state officials are demanding that the Center turn over documents it had filed with the Internal Revenue Service, revealing the identities of its private donors. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Harris, 741 S.W.2d 334, 335-36 (Tenn. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Harris, 35 A.D.3d 1197 [4th Dept. 2006]; People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
We’ve booed the drafting of Donovan McNabb, cheered Brad Lidge, mourned our beloved Harry Kalas and thrown snowballs at Santa. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am
First, Roe was first and foremost a victory for doctors, whose rights, Justice Harry Blackmun later suggested, were the real objective of his opinion. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Some state laws, however, allow plaintiffs to recover damages for enforcing the state equivalent of Title III provisions. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit contravened the Supreme Court’s repeated admonition that “state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt,” as in Cullen v. [read post]
