Search for: "Head v State" Results 2941 - 2960 of 14,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd v Heath [2009] EWCA Civ 1135 It has taken me a day or three to get to this one. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
  Meanwhile on Monday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Snyder v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
June 7, 2018) (purported class action removed from state to federal court alleging Charter Communications has failed to provide certain internet and cable services in violation of state law) Washington v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am by Eleonora Rosati
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.The event will now dedicate one of its two panels to a discussion of the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Lidl v Tesco.Starting at 2pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:35 am by SHG
In light of the issues presented by United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
This benefits both the trade mark offices and businesses.General indications of the class headings to identify the goods and services are fine as long as the identifications are sufficiently clear and precise to allow the competent authorities and economic operators to determine the scope of the protection sought.Different approaches to the use of the general indications of the class headings of the Nice Classification might lead to a difference in the extent of the protection of a… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:57 pm by WIMS
" This lengthy, highly complex and split decision is sure to turn the air pollution world on its head. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Simon Chester
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, Filed: December 10, 1999. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]