Search for: "Hope v. Hope"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 23,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
But I should hope that we would all agree that a system (here, the County of Fresno's) that tells a criminal defense lawyer "You'll be paid a flat $80,000 to do a death penalty case, and that rate includes all expenses (e.g., for investigation and experts)" creates an unacceptably high risk that counsel might skimp on experts and investigation since, after all, that money essentially comes out of his or her own pocket.Someone's life is at stake. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
I hope you’ll read the whole thing, but the upshot is: (1) the arguments for infringement and against a fair use defense are very strong and (2) raising fair use defenses in situations where it doesn’t belong hurts everyone. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:21 pm
But to no avail.Here's hoping that 2009 is better than 2008 for you. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Nouri & Anor, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 1379 (27 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) R & Ors (Minors), R (on the application of) v The Child and Family Court Advisory and Support Service [2012] EWCA Civ 853 (29 June 2012) Loader, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Goverment & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 869 (29 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Gaydamak v Leviev [2012]… [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Holt v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:13 am
App. 1990), and Gasque v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:25 am
I continue to experiment with this, and I hope not to the terrible detriment of my 100 students. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 9:47 am
(I have long supported the Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
The court distinguishes Lemmon v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The defence was initially based on, as the Court of Appeal puts it, ‘the hope’ that Doherty in the Lords would adopt McCann v UK. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
Compare how Swift v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:03 am
Last week, the Indiana Supreme Court came out our way.In Kovach v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:40 am
In his statement to the court in State of Arizona v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:38 am
Let's hope this judgment will induce agencies and courts to investigate properly the effects of the alleged discrimination on the downstream market. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:10 am
Mubashir v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:19 pm
” In this follow-on article, I discuss last Term's decision in FCC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 am
Like Sifuentes v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
That is another good reason to hope this lawsuit fails. [read post]
