Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 5,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2010, 10:26 am
However, the Commission made it clear that the debate should be re-open (cf. article 30 of the Regulation), and this is precisely the object of Mrs Wallis’s Working Document on the Amendement of Regulation EC N°864/2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, which offers an insightful overview on the matter 2. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 2:06 pm
A public hearing is scheduled for December 1, 2016. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 2:06 pm
A public hearing is scheduled for December 1, 2016. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:21 pm
Seventh Dimension protested this amendment at GAO. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
” Id. at *10. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
A special purpose grand jury, however, is convened to assist a district attorney’s investigation into a specific matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
P., Rule 1.190(c), to allow this circumvention of the statute of limitations was by the Fifth District Court of Appeals[1] in Gatins v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
P., Rule 1.190(c), to allow this circumvention of the statute of limitations was by the Fifth District Court of Appeals[1] in Gatins v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Amended by L.1981, c. 290, s. 43, eff. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
" In Re the Matter of the Involuntary Commitment of R.K. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:56 pm
Apotex raised two issues on appeal: (1) whether the contempt proceeding was beyond the district court's statutory authority because the Hatch-Waxman Act does not itself grant a district court subject matter jurisdiction to conduct such contempt proceedings; and (2) whether the contempt proceeding was improper in any event because the infringement inquiry was amenable only to trial under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Approved by full House 3/1/12. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:00 am
Nor would I say that oral argument never matters. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
Wetch, 17-886 Issues: (1) Whether it violates the First Amendment for state law to presume that the petitioner consents to subsidizing non-chargeable speech by the group he is compelled to fund (an “opt-out” rule), as opposed to an “opt-in” rule whereby the petitioner must affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech; and (2) whether Keller v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Later that day, by a 2-1 vote, it stayed those portions of the injunction that prohibited HHS from preventing others from transporting Doe to a facility for the abortion and “from interfering with or obstructing J.D. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
It has a post of its Top 10 Stories over the past 6 years. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
As Professor Eugene Volokh has explained, “Apodaca was a 4-1-4 decision, in which both of the groups of 4 Justices took the view that the rule should be the same for federal and state trials. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In aggregate, they grew more than 10 percent just in the last year. [read post]
