Search for: "JONES v. THE STATE" Results 2941 - 2960 of 6,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2008, 6:27 am
Woodhead has lightning speed in all directions, but with size and weight normally considered too small for pro ball.However, Woodhead is bigger and faster than Darren Sproles, and is about the same size and speed as Maruice Jones-Drew, both of whom have been quite successful in the NFL, and Woodhead has better combine-type stats at all levels than Sproles, so that we expect someone to take him in the draft as a return man for special teams.Omon was the MVP in the Texas v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
Whether this would be wise will depend on the circumstances, but given that the Tesla case confirms that the principles set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946 and Lait v Evening Standard [2011] EWCA Civ 859 apply equally to malicious falsehood claims, there would have to be good reasons for not suing on the original – particularly if your own actions in the interim suggest that you have not suffered any damage. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:42 pm by Goldberg Jones
Related Reading: The New Tax Plan and Divorce: What You Need to Know Separate V. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
Heller applies to the states. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
The ruling is the latest significant decision dismantling a gun restriction in the wake of the Supreme Court’s expansion of Second Amendment rights last year in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]