Search for: "Legal Recoveries, Inc." Results 2941 - 2960 of 3,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Freeman, 43 Misc.2d 616, 251 N.Y.S.2d 996, affd. 24 A.D.2d 704, 262 N.Y.S.2d 431; National Psychological Assn. for Psychoanalysis, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK INTERNATIONAL (AMERICAS) LIMITED and STANCHART SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Danek Medical, Inc., 520 S.E.2d 88, 92 (N.C. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Those inspections noted several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Without American Pipe’s protective rule, class members who lack confidence that the lead counsel has cleared all legal hurdles to recovery may make protective filings even after class certification has been granted. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm by Rob Robinson
Morgan Securities LLC acted as financial advisor to Carbonite, and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP acted as legal advisor. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The ruling makes sense from the standpoint of the way most statutes and common law legal requirements work. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Blankfein: Demand Not Excused The next case involving derivative claims and demand futility stems from investment bank Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
Schlumberger Offshore Service, Inc., which embraced some version of the “but for” causation. [read post]