Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
Charity Commission, in which Lord Mance stated that, “Article 10 would itself become a European-wide Freedom of Information law. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
Meanwhile, the Press Gazette reported a bizarre attack on the Royal Charter by Lord Lester who apparently regarded it as outrageous because some people that he talks to have confused it with the Star Chamber. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Then, that was a panel discussion that additionally included Lord Justice Floyd (also sitting on the UPC Rules of Procedure Committee), Alan Johnson (Bristows), and Richard Vary (Nokia). [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
Lord Bellamy, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Ministry of Justice, told the House that the Government hopes to publish its initial response to the Law Commission’s final recommendations on reforming weddings law in England and Wales in the first part of next year. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
As Lord Lester appears to recognise, this is not a reform proposal which should be taken forward. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
” Rather than face the inevitable sack, Judge Woodcock-Bolton resigned on medical grounds…”The Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice have decided no further disciplinary action is required. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
The full document is available here and our summary is here, and reflects the leading judgment of Lord Bingham (at 21) and the comments of Lord Hope (at 49) in Regina (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2006] 2 AC 148. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:04 am
Praise and glory be yours, O Lord, now and forever more. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
Coupled with this, the Home Office Interim Guidance stated that while stereotyping was not permitted a person’s faith or ethnicity might, in combination with other factors, be relevant (p. 12). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm
No state power, no delegation. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
To that extent, as I discuss here, the UK Supreme Court's recent decision in Smith v Secretary of State for Defence, in which it held that UK soldiers do not have rights against the UK under the ECHR when operating outside an area under UK effective control, was in accordance with the principle of universality. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction:… [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
