Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court" Results 2941 - 2960 of 6,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2022, 4:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court limits on various agencies’ disgorgement power are piecemeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:33 am by Steven Boutwell
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued perhaps the most significant and far-reaching decision affecting state sales and use tax collection since its Quill v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:49 am
Golotta, 178 N.J. 205, 217-218, 837 A.2d 359, 366 (N.J. 2003) (wherein the New Jersey Supreme Court using similar considerations reduced the degree of corroboration necessary to uphold the stop of a motorist suspected of erratic driving who had been reported by an anonymous caller). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:17 pm by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
Because this recent amendment renders legally impossible the Supreme Court’s prior savings construction of the Affordable Care Act’s core provision—the individual mandate—the Court should hold that the ACA is unlawful and enjoin its operation. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:12 pm by Josh Blackman
My understanding is that Justice Bradley participated in Cruikshank before the District of Louisiana, and there is no indication he recused on that case when it was certified to the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 5:49 pm
Louisiana (June 25, 2008) Footnotes in Supreme Court Opinions (December 19, 2008) [read post]
” Under that rule, a 3-member panel may not overturn a prior panel “absent an intervening change in law, such as by statutory amendment, or the Supreme Court, or the en banc Court. [read post]
” Under that rule, a 3-member panel may not overturn a prior panel “absent an intervening change in law, such as by statutory amendment, or the Supreme Court, or the en banc Court. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:33 pm by Scott Seiler and Liskow & Lewis
” Under that rule, a 3-member panel may not overturn a prior panel “absent an intervening change in law, such as by statutory amendment, or the Supreme Court, or the en banc Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 7:21 am by Denise Harle
Regardless of whether it gets to the other questions in June Medical, the Supreme Court should resolve the key threshold issue of third-party standing. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:04 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Criminal Lawyers' Association of Ontario After 20 years on the Supreme Court, Ginsburg rates herself the hardest-working justice North Dakota judge blocks law designed to close state’s only abortion clinic NSA leaker Snowden granted asylum in Russia, lawyer says NSA Phone data collection declassified in effort to assuage Capitol Hill - The Hill Pennsylvania officials seek to block same-sex marriages licenses Ontario can set pay for 'friends of the court' lawyers… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:37 am by Jeff Gittins
It is a rare occurrence that the United State Supreme Court hears a case involving water rights. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
Both had been filed in early 1970 and had then come before special three-judge district courts from which direct appeal to the Supreme Court was possible following the panels’ denials of injunctive relief. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm by Eric Muller
  I would have liked to see the Iowa Supreme Court experiment with such an approach. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court to revisit last month's ruling that struck down the death penalty for child rape, saying justices in the majority failed to consider that the military allows that punishment for that crime.The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, outlawed executing child rapists in the case of Patrick Kennedy, a Harvey man who was convicted and sentenced to die in 2003.Connick's decision is based on the high court failing to consider that military law… [read post]