Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2019, 5:52 pm
The statute doesn't require that the defendant knew the statement was false or likely false, and is thus inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent.So U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Turning to the arguments remaining before us, "[t]he scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor* had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use" (Matter of Hudson Val. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Turning to the arguments remaining before us, "[t]he scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor* had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use" (Matter of Hudson Val. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
If you want a comprehensive and relatively neutral tax base, significant exemption thresholds will be at least a matter of regret. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:00 am
Socially speaking, we may want to push companies towards Strategy B. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:49 pm
In the Matter of E.F.B.D. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:01 pm
The matter was then adjourned to another day. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:01 pm
The matter was then adjourned to another day. [read blog]
11 Feb 2017, 9:03 am
You might say this doesn’t matter. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm
...but this time it isn't Rothstein's people; it's Lew Freeman's. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:14 am
But isn't this all a little airy-fairy? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:30 pm
Its failure to act leaves us today with no choice but to declare §4(b) unconstitutional." [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 6:56 am
Gould's proposed niche makes sense and would have made life easier for this group of clients.Too bad the bar didn't see it the same way. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 7:11 am
Deep tension b/t empiricism and normativity in both these areas. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Realising damages and costs awards can be a fraught,complex and time consuming matter. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Realising damages and costs awards can be a fraught,complex and time consuming matter. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
When they understand what the law permits, they get a sense of alignment b/t their sense of ethics and the law. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:09 am
You can’t do it… they don’t exist. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
The Wagstaffe Group also authors T he Wagstaffe Practice Guide: Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial . [read post]
