Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 5,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Condoms made in Germany | the Beckhams’ IP.Never too late 53 [week ending on Sunday 28 June] - EU trade marks in Arabic in Case C 147/14 | Is UberPop a transport service? [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
However TOP Logistics, in providing a warehouse service for goods bearing another’s trade mark, did not 'use a sign identical to that trade mark for goods or services identical or similar to those in respect of which the mark is registered'.* Accordingly, Article 5 must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark registered in one or more Member States may oppose a third party placing goods bearing that… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:22 pm
Sounds good, so why doesn't she like it? [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
In short, Coty was the exclusive licensee for the Community trade mark DAVIDOFF HOT WATER for perfumery. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:57 am
This latest reference is Case C-230/15 Brite Strike Technologies, a request from the Dutch Rechtbank in relation to the following questions:I. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
This latest reference is Case C-230/15 Brite Strike Technologies, a request from the Dutch Rechtbank in relation to the following questions:I. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Instead, the section is about keeping people who practice witchcraft, even in good faith, under [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:58 am
Section 2 of the Lanham Act empowers the PTO to deny or cancel a mark’s registration, and thus control what appears on the Principal Register, on a number of grounds, including [besides the prohibition on disparaging marks] any mark that: (b) Consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof; (c) Consists of or comprises a name,… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The floor goes to Neil.* Sofa, so good? [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
As the case focused on only the concert service and CD/DVD goods in classes 41 and 9, he had to determine whether the mark was distinctive in those goods and service, or if it was merely descriptive. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:46 pm
The second ground was that Applicant’s proposed marks would likely cause dilution of its marks by blurring pursuant to Trademark Act Section 43(c). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
On that basis the CTMs had not been used by Sofa Workshop in the five year period in order to maintain or create market share within the EU for the goods or services covered by the marks. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
Good day for maple leaf growers? [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
” He found both tweets conveyed imputations (c )/(d). [read post]
Guest Post: In Rush to Invalidate Patents at Pleadings Stage, Are Courts Coloring Outside the Lines?
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 558 (2007) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
US footwear manufacturer Skechers opposed on absolute grounds, objecting that the marks were devoid of any distinctive character under the Trade Marks Act 1994 s 3(1)(b) and that they were purely descriptive contrary to s3(1)(c) of the same Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Earlier this month, thanks to Axel Paul Ringelhann, the IPKat announced the reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union of some Community trade mark questions relating to phonetic similarities between marks in Case C-223/15 Combit Software. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
TM law: in past, would’ve said TM was less fact specific and more formal, looking at similarity of signs, similarity of goods, and distinctiveness of the mark, and not much at what the consumer does in particular circumstances. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Also one reason for the huge expense is b/c courts have set the bar so high. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Consumer is less a delimiter in US scholarship than the licensor of expansion, b/c consumer perception is malleable when you have good counsel. [read post]
