Search for: "Mark Case" Results 2941 - 2960 of 70,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am by David Oscar Markus
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:46 am
This is the question that the Swedish Patent and Registration Office (PRV) had to address in an interesting application concerning a sign of this kind [see also here for another commentary on this case]. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
To encourage consistency across the site and make the sales process as easy as possible for consumers, Amazon encourages sellers to use pre-existing generic ASINs (or Amazon Standard Identification Numbers) where possible.A recent IPEC case, Jadebray  & Noa and Nani v Clarke-Coles [2017] EWHC 1400 considered whether this reuse could constitute trade mark infringement and passing off in certain circumstances.What happened? [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:09 am by John L. Welch
The USPTO's definitions of "scandalous" come from a 1938 case, In re Riverbank Canning Co., 95 F.2d 327 (C.C.P.A. 1938), which urges the rejection of marks that are "disgraceful" or "offensive" or "disreputable." [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 7:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  So, the IPKat eagerly awaits her analysis of this decision, the nuances and, indeed as the Press Release noted, the difficulty in making clear distinctions in these cases as to what constitutes trade mark "use" under the Regulation. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:00 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Ballantyne Stewart & Coy Ltd. (1959 RPC (273)) for tendency to abbreviate marks in said business and on the Taverner’s case to prove the case of initial natural confusion. [read post]
Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, arguing that the case should never have been accepted because any claim of relief was mooted when the license expired during litigation. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:04 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement over the weekend in advance of this week's pre-trial hearings in the 9/11 case: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 5 DECEMBER 2015 Good evening. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
In this case, the nuances of the trademark process pitted an unregistered mark with actual sales against an intent to use application without sales. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:57 am
” Nonetheless, the Board noted that in this case, even if the exhibits had been considered, they would not have affected the outcome. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:05 am
With an application filed in December 2012 Mr Carlos Moreira sought to register the word mark “Neymar” as an EU trade mark (EUTM) for goods in class 25 (clothing, footwear, headgear) of the Nice Classification. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:57 pm by support
In April 2012, Cooper announced a recall of 1,084 tires that had incorrect markings that meant that owners were misled regarding the maximum permissible inflation pressure and maximum load. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 5:50 pm by Howard Bashman
“This Supreme Court Term’s Grimmest Cases Share One Thing in Common”: Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have this Jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 7:02 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court will take up abortion and gun cases in its new term while ethics concerns swirl”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:45 am by Steve Brachmann
In Montauk U.S.A. v. 148 South Emerson Associates the Second Circuit vacated-in-part an earlier ruling in a trademark case. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:55 am
"Top court reviews free speech case of man's anti-police rap": Mark Scolforo of The Associated Press has an article that begins, "Pennsylvania's highest court is reviewing the conviction of a Pittsburgh man for making threats against police in a rap song after he was charged with drug offenses. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:15 pm by Rick Hasen
AJC: A federal judge on Friday rejected a request from former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to move his Fulton County election interference case to U.S. [read post]