Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 19,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2024, 1:11 am
With regards to the disclosure requirement for the technical effect relied on for inventive step, the Boards of Appeal have further adopted a patentee friendly interpretation of G 2/21, whereby the application as filed does not need to provide evidence of, or even to explicitly mention, the technical effect (T 0116/18, T 1989/19, T 2465/19). [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:23 am
The JSA R&O does contain some (very minimal) good news for a small universe of broadcasters: the new limits will not apply to national sales representatives. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
The appellate court said that, as a threshold matter, the FFP did not involve any “state action,” a necessary element of any dormant Commerce Clause claim. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:47 am
As an initial matter, while it was not the focus of his paper, Lund does a very nice job of grappling with some of the criticisms of Say on Pay. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Furthermore, the public nature of a traffic stop makes the entire matter less intimidating than station house questioning. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:35 am
First, this office does not exist as it would only be formed if Bill C-27 becomes law. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:05 am
Despite the fact that Connecticut does not require experts in this context, as a practical matter we don’t expect too many situations in our area of the law when a plaintiff’s lawyer won’t trot out a bunch of experts. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Applying the political structure analysis, the Ninth Circuit determined that Section 31 was constitutional because the law “addresse[d] in neutral-fashion race-related and gender-related matters. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 10:31 am
But, Judge Willis says, this is a matter of principle, not of finances. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
Interstate Custody Dispute: Does the GA adoption divest KY of custody jurisdiction? [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
And never mind that both just before 1787, under the Articles of Confederation (which also used the term “legislature” of the states), and shortly after 1787, state constitutions explicitly regulated federal elections and did not leave the matter to state legislatures.Never mind all of that. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
It does not and should not matter where an amendment is made. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
The Iowa provision makes the matter absolutely clear by adopting the Delaware approach. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
The Court of Appeals then pointed out thatBose thus suggests that when a discovery motion—typically a matter of discretion—implicates the First Amendment, the trial court is no longer better positioned to decide the issue in question. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:02 am
There are also some matters of lesser practical import that I would like to discuss here. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
But he does so with a twist. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:27 pm
The intention of the insurance company in drafting the policy does not matter. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:24 am
It aims to illuminate certain effects of the adoption of CTB (and perhaps later section 954(c)(6)) in the international realm. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm
No matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:59 pm
What does legitimacy mean and what does it have to do with constitutions? [read post]
