Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2015, 9:35 am
Dax: I guess my concern would be, and I will segue it into my follow up question, my concern would be that you have an investor who simply looks at the returns as well as come a 37% last year, the S&P was at 20 or whatever the numbers might be, and they are thinking, “Give me more hedge fund, and do we have financial advisors who are saying “no” pump the brakes here, we’re really only permitted to put 5 to 10% of your portfolio here. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
No. 105-119, p. 67 (1997), but President Clinton vetoed the bill, see Message to the House of Representatives Returning Without Approval Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Legislation, 33 Weekly Comp. of Pres. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The House of Commons has voted against forcing the Government to hold part two of the Leveson inquiry. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
In Ross v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
Programs for Children with Special Health Care Needs Maternal and Child Health Crippled Children's Programs Department of Health P. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm
Mother believes that A.L. has grown used to their apartment, but she will always miss her old house. 7. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm
Mother believes that A.L. has grown used to their apartment, but she will always miss her old house. 7. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Andrews v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Gallagher (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-1032 Issue(s): (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so, (2) what test should be used to analyze them. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
See Gibson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:55 am
Barasch v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
The case is Bennett v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
See, e.g., Clinton Rossiter, The Supreme Court and the Commander in Chief 109 (Richard P. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
Couden v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Hines, Assistant Attorney General, John P. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm
See Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures, p.23, U.S. [read post]
