Search for: "People v David S." Results 2941 - 2960 of 5,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
Moore’s article published on 15 June 2013 was titled: ‘We are too weak to face up to the extremism in our midst… Despite the Woolwich outrage, David Cameron has failed to act against Islamist terrorism. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  Sir David Eady was not persuaded by the Defendant’s “unknown hacker” defence and held that it was likely that he was responsible for a defamatory post on Google Maps concerning the Claimants. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
On 6 March 2015, Sir David Eady gave judgment in the case of The Bussey Law Firm PC v Page [2015] EWHC 563 (QB). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:29 am by SHG
Unless linguists produce verifiable data, says David A. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:32 pm by Kyle Green
To allow officers to search peoples cell phones without a warrant is a violation of privacy and a violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:32 pm by Kyle Green
To allow officers to search peoples cell phones without a warrant is a violation of privacy and a violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In October 2014, Mr Justice Mann ordered Mirror Group to give “generic disclosure” in relation to phone hacking, that is documents going to the general practices of phone hacking at the group’s titles  (Various Claimants v MGN [2014] EWHC 3655 (Ch)). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
Coverage and commentary continue in anticipation of next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am by Sebastian Brady
In 2007, Australian David Hicks, who was picked up in 2001 after training with al Qaeda, pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorism; the CMCR voided his conviction and sentence on the grounds that, in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
For some years there has been debate between the judges about whether anonymity orders should be made when very seriously injured peoples claims are settled and the court is asked to approve the settlement. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 11:30 am by Friedland Law Group
After nearly a year and a half of litigation, parties to the case of Estate of Nelson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]