Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 2941 - 2960 of 6,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 7 March 2016, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Willers v Joyce & Anor (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)), which raises the issue of whether the Courts of England and Wales should continue to treat decisions of the Privy Council, made by a board comprising solely of serving Supreme Court Justices who have heard full argument and made their decision on the basis of English Law, as having no status as legal… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The device at issue is an iPhone 5c, used by Syed Rizwan Farook, who with his wife, Tashfeen Malik, opened fire during a holiday party at the Inland Regional Center in the San Bernardino massacre, killing 14 people and injuring 22 others. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by Donald Thompson
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Steven M. Taber
  However, once approved by the FAA, there is no specific mechanism to ensure that the airport will take any action to implement the noise compatibility program and protect people from the substantial harm presented by aircraft noise. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Property v. liability rules. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am by Daniel Shaviro
I accept the political science case for having a Constitution and court system, with the courts having a mandate, a la Marbury v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Aesthetic to efferent is a switch of modes: experience v. studying for the midterm. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Maryland and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that petitioner’s sole attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
One comment uttered that “people like this should go and shit a hedgehog and spend all their money on their mothers’ tombs until they drop dead”. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case from a New Jersey family court, decided in August, but just released for publication earlier this month, D.G. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee was fired on March 18, 2013, and she stipulated that the termination resulted solely from her rule violations. [read post]