Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 1:38 pm
You can complain to their superiors. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In so many past wartime decisions, the Court had deferred to the president’s “superior expertise” in national security (Pearlstein). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:58 pm
Just last term, in Vermont v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:48 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:52 am
Today finally saw an Indiana Supreme Court decision of one of those cases—League of Women Voters of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:28 am
In Edmond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Second Circuit decision, Gates v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:50 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
P&G v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:51 am
In Sterling v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Your ad makes fun of overweight people: respond to the complaint. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
Justice Scalia, though typically exaggerating the negative consequences of comments with which he disagreed, was probably close to correct in suggesting that lower court judges and litigating lawyers will focus on the privacy discussion the Court allowed itself to make, rather than the specific legal outcome, in City of Ontario, et al., v. [read post]
