Search for: "Persons v. Jones"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 2:19 am
Jones v First-tier Tribunal [2011] EWCA Civ 400; [2011] WLR (D) 131 “An offence of inflicting grevious bodily harm, contrary to section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, was a ‘crime of violence’ for the purposes of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2001. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
Accordingly, Judge Gleeson, citing the Appellate Division’s ruling in Jones v Westchester County, 644 NY2d 640, granted the State’s motion to summarily dismiss this branch of Sanni’s complaint. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
Smith and Tommy Jones. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:45 am
In Virginia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Coyle v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:34 pm
The Rough Justice programme on iPlayer (while it is available) The Guardian on Jones v Kaney: After supreme court decision, will other witnesses remain immune? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney (see earlier post by Rosalind English) removes the immunity previously enjoyed by those who have acted as experts from suit by their former clients. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
Moreover, under the doctrine established in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) a claimant may apply to have a claim struck out as an abuse of process on the basis that it does not involve the commission of a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
The claimant sued after the council sent an email to a number of people, informing them that her name had been put onto its “violent persons register”. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Apr. 25, 2008) (holding expert witness should not have been permitted to testify as to his interpretation of a statute); Jones v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
., Petitioners, v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:37 pm
Vieira; Jones Day, and Stephanie E. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:03 am
This immunity has now been overturned by the Supreme Court of the UK in the decision of Jones v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am
Although Jones v Kaney will be remembered as the case that abolished the immunity from suit of expert witnesses (at least in respect of claims brought by a litigant to whom the expert owed a duty), it is notable that this was not the only policy issue on which the divided (5-2) Supreme Court clashed. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In addition to the “threshold of seriousness”, the court can be asked to decide whether there is a “real and substantial tort” and, if there is not, to strike the claim out as an abuse: Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:13 pm
Jones, 2011 Ore. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
We mentioned the British Columbia case of Lawson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:41 am
Jones and William L. [read post]
