Search for: "STATE v BURNS" Results 2941 - 2960 of 3,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
  But I will note that in Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:30 am
State of New York NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenants' Position Their Tenancies Could Return To Rent Control Law Does Not Withstand ScrutinySandow v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
High Court (Commercial Division) Inta Navigation Ltd & Anor v Ranch Investments Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 1216 (Comm) (05 June 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Speciality Produce Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2009] EWHC 1245 (Admin) (05 June 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Dean v Burne & Ors [2009] EWHC 1250 (Ch) [...] [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:25 am
In Utkan v Szuwala, Jenina Szuwala sued her landlord, Deniz Efe Utkan, for her child's burn damages. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
As the court stated in McClain:[A]nother methodological problem undermines [the expert's] analogical approach. . . . [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: District Court S D New York grants authors four more months to decide whether to participate in Google Book Search settlement; Department of Justice begin enquiry in antitrust implications of settlement (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Excess Copyright) (Out-Law) (EFF) Microsoft – Linux activists take on Microsoft with TomTom… [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
The only way to ensure that this does not occur is to preempt the state law standard for setting compensation. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
” Last week, the Justices of the United States Supreme Court debated just that scenario, in Redding v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
   As the 9th District explains in State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
  Although the motion judge refused to strike the claim, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and stated that the proper defendant in the case was the manufacturer. [read post]