Search for: "STATE v. DAVIS"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 6,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:29 am
STATE OF WYOMING ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:08 am
To prevent people from being held in indefinite limbo, the Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:15 am
SANDS v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:41 am
JD by Davis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm
”For the decision:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-appeals-court-rulingFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states Contact: AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
THE STATE OF WYOMING and MATTHEW H. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:15 am
Affirmed.Case Name: CARLOS YAMMON PENA v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
Case Name: KELVIN BOURKE v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am
Davis 17-6883 Issue: Whether—when the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dustin Chadwick v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:55 am
" See United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
The Supreme Court has wrestled with the concept of how much partisanship is too much since first finding partisan-gerrymandering claims justiciable in Davis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
” In the denial of the cellphone tower data case (Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:28 am
That ruling came in the case of Liberty University v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm
[Ed. note: I am counsel for the defendant in the second decision summarized here.]United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:11 pm
T.K. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
King v State, Supreme Court No. 140684.Given the departure of Justice Davis from the Court (who was in the majority), a motion for rehearing seems likely. [read post]
