Search for: "STATE v. LAWRENCE"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2008, 12:36 pm
e) Readers may recollect the classic case of the printer of company documents who used the price sensitive information in such documents to deal in their shares and make profit (United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
Due to the peculiar way that the adoption statute defines "homosexual" in terms of conduct rather than status, there is a clear conflict with the US Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:11 am
Most significantly, she invoked the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:19 pm
That provision was established by the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:34 am
Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential] Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination... [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:26 pm
In an interesting decision from Judge Larimer in the Western District of New York, United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:44 pm
See State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:18 pm
The case is DiCosolo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:25 pm
The Court of Appeals' NFP decision yesterday in the case of Ashley Ray Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:18 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (9): Ashley Ray Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:14 pm
"'Cupo spent over $250,000 to have his case against Lawrence Denike tried to conclusion and now as a direct result of the actions of Thomas J. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
According to Justice O'Connor, in her concurring opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:42 pm
Paul Co., 787 A.2d 376 (Pa. 2001) and the decision of the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas in Harlan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:32 pm
The solution is to create a one-off exception to the exclusionary rule for terrorists who attacked the United States in the past, a one-off return to the rule which prevailed prior to Mapp v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:44 pm
Supreme Court's 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 2:28 pm
-v-LAWRENCE E. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
Although it is essentially this balance of the Court that decided Romer and Lawrence, the two major pro-gay-rights decisions of the Court, it is also this balance of the Court that decided Boy Scouts v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:30 am
" You can access today's transcript of oral argument in Van de Kamp v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28… [read post]
