Search for: "STATE v. SCOTT" Results 2941 - 2960 of 6,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:03 am by Annette Burns
  What I found here that didn’t appear at other sites:   “Ask Angie” and “Andi v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Vienna Beef, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by Christopher G. Hill
For example, in a recent case out of Fairfax County, Artitech, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit weighed in again, issuing an opinion finding such a clause unenforceable under Washington state law. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Unlikely Allies and Their Arguments Scott Turow, author and former prosecutor, agrees with us: Opposition to the death penalty isn't a conservative v. liberal argument. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 8:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
North Carolina (Indian Status; Criminal Jurisdiction) A petition for habeas corpus was filed in one case on 6/17/20:In Re Scott Louis YoungBear (Civil Rights Violations) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.html Oneida Nation v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Because McCullough did not appeal his sentence, we do not reach the merits of the State's cross-appeal.NFP civil opinions today (8): Heather (Parmeter) Scott v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]