Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 2941 - 2960
of 41,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2013, 11:05 am
Tamaya Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Santa Ana Star Casino, CIV 2007-005711 (“underlying state court litigation”). [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
§ 52.21(b)(23)(i). [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:44 am
The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals published a new opinion yesterday, United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 11:00 am
Krempetz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:18 am
In Steven Hollin v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:02 am
AC34533 - State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:32 am
A UCMJ conviction is deemed to have taken place on United States soil and the defendant's subsequent conviction is properly enhanced under Penal Code §12.42(c)(2)(b)(v) for that conviction. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Part II-B. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Part II-B. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
The Rule 54(b) Trap: Dealing with Non-final Orders in Cases with Multiple Claims or Multiple Parties
15 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
See Coleman v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:32 pm
Bennett v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status for the purposes of Civil Service Law §75.1(b)Serviss v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 2018 NY Slip Op 05597, Appellate Division, Second Department§75.1 of the Civil Service Laws generally bars the termination of a tenured officer or employee in the Competitive Class of Classified Service of the State or a political subdivision of the State "except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing… [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am
Besser v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 12:48 pm
Summerlin, 310 U.S. 414 (1940); and United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
” In October, the state filed suit in federal court in Texas, accusing federal Border Patrol agents of violating state laws when they cut or moved the wire fencing. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
Without item-specific knowledge of infringing activity, a service provider could not be found to have "the right and ability to control" infringing activity under section 512(c)(1)(B). [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
