Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 2941 - 2960 of 9,595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2017, 9:03 pm by News Desk
In the meantime, Georgia health officials are urging anyone with symptoms of food poisoning to seek medical attention and tell their doctors about possible exposure to a foodborne pathogen. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:11 am by Rosalind English
The ruling on Tony Bland is now nearly twenty years old (Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789) and there the patient was in a permanent vegetative state after being crushed at the 1989 Hillsborough stadium disaster. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The jury was further advised via the stipulation that on February 26, 2013 Mohan Sharma stated that he engaged in other instances of conduct similar to his misconduct in January 2013. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:11 am by News Desk
Anyone experiencing these symptoms is encouraged to visit their doctor. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm by Robert McKennon
  After his doctors stated that Burnett’s psychiatric condition prevented him from performing his job duties, he filed a claim for STD benefits. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:18 pm
Well, folks, that kind of claim handling is why they own those big buildings in most downtown metropolitan cities.Ever since the 2003 decision in State Farm v Campbell, the courts have been restricting the availability of punitive damages as a deterrent to big business fraud, greed and just plain stupidity.What we said before about Dead Donkeys and Car Dealers (click here) is still true. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In particular, she did not submit any doctors’ affidavits or medical records documenting the severity of her condition (see Matter of Brigade v Olatoye, 167 AD3d 462 [1st Dept 2018]; Santana v Union Hosp. of Bronx, 300 AD2d 56 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The resolution of conflicting medical evidence is within the sole province of the Medical Board, and it [is] entitled to credit the diagnosis of its own doctors over that of the petitioner's doctor" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d 847, 849). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The resolution of conflicting medical evidence is within the sole province of the Medical Board, and it [is] entitled to credit the diagnosis of its own doctors over that of the petitioner's doctor" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d 847, 849). [read post]