Search for: "State v. Hands" Results 2941 - 2960 of 31,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am by Joanne Zimolzak
On the other hand, the lawyer representing the state interests experienced difficulty describing a "manageable" lawsuit and was peppered with questions by the court's traditionally more liberal Justices. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The plot revolves primarily around Juno’s decision to place the child for an adoption with a couple she has hand-picked. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 3:30 am
The California Supreme Court upheld the rights of protesters inside a shopping mall when it handed out its opinion on Christmas Eve for the case of Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Six months before Dobbs was handed down, the Supreme Court allowed a federal court lawsuit challenging SB8 to be brought against at least a few Texas state licensing officials who, according to the lead opinion of Justice Neil Gorsuch in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
Before the judgment was handed down the parties reached a negotiated settlement on 13 July 2012. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:20 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Nor is it capable of clear or even-handed application. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Gender-based employment discrimination by a United States Congressman in violation of the Fifth Amendment, Davis v. [read post]