Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2012, 3:30 am
There was nothing to show that the film has been shown on television or distributed on DVD in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
” Of these decisions, one—Hughes v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:59 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 60 AD3d 1184Christine A. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 2009 NY Slip Op 01753, Decided on March 12, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentChristine A. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 5:43 pm
In 88766 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
Judge Abrams wrote that this “argument is unpersuasive because it conflicts with the Second Circuit’s holding in Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm
Nelson in 1972 and last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 pm
Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 5:05 am
In Pickens v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:28 am
Since the history-making case of Martin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The same Ms Swift has been working hard to secure trade mark protection in the United States for elements of her song lyrics, such as the vivid imagery of "this sick beat" and the rather more prosaic "we never go out of style". [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
United States, 588 U. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The DOW wouldn't cross the 1,000 mark again until late in 1982. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am
In a different case involving Zoominfo, Rebecca Tushnet and Mark Lemley will be filing an amicus brief on this point. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:49 am
Even assuming that B & B Hardware stands for the proposition that, when considering the issue of priority, courts must determine whether the actual use of a mark is the same as the use stated in a trademark application, Ashe has alleged no actual use of the mark other than those uses described in his trademark application. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:05 am
Perry, Conscience v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:58 am
This case is of particular interest to securities litigators because it is one of several cases since the landmark Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Estate of Mark Parsons, et al. v. [read post]
