Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 75,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In State of North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:32 am
In case of State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Paragraph 2(b) provides that generic restrictions with respect to the legal standards of the requesting State for processing personal data may not be imposed by the requested State as a condition under paragraph 2(a) to providing evidence or information. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:28 pm
” Ranza v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V The contracting Parties shall not be bound to delivery up their own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this treaty. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:58 pm
Justice Alito states the issue simply in his majority opinion: Section 1983 provides a cause of action against any person acting under color of state law who "subjects" a person or "causes [a person] to be subjected . . . to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
Moreover, the Justices also unanimously held that the expression “financially independent” in s 117B(3) means an absence of financial dependence upon the state. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 11:27 am
In my last post on Maryland v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:22 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Davis of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has set up a clash between judges in that district over whether Virginia recognizes the “independent personal stake” exception to the intra-corporate immunity or intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 4:24 pm
” The court drew upon the case of Johnson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm
” If you recall, in my case Eells v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:49 pm
Any person charged with an offence has the right… (b) to be tried within a reasonable time; The Supreme Court of Canada affirmed in R. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:25 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]